Incomplete information, proportional representation and strategic voting

Troumpounis, Orestis and Xefteris, Dimitrios (2016) Incomplete information, proportional representation and strategic voting. Social Choice and Welfare, 47 (4). pp. 879-903. ISSN 0176-1714

[thumbnail of resubmit_SCWR2_250816]
Preview
PDF (resubmit_SCWR2_250816)
resubmit_SCWR2_250816.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial.

Download (413kB)

Abstract

We introduce incomplete information to a multiparty election under proportional representation: each voter knows her preferences and votes strategically to maximize her payoffs, but is uncertain about the number and the preferences of the other voters. Parties are assumed to be purely office motivated and, hence, the resulting governments are always minimum winning. In this framework we prove a) generic existence of equilibria where only two parties receive a positive fraction of the votes and therefore lead to single-party governments and b) generic inexistence of equilibria that lead to coalition governments. That is, contrary to common wisdom, a proportional rule is found not to promote sincere voting and to be favorable towards single-party governments. The existence of two-party equilibria that lead to single-party governments is robust to parties having ideological concerns.

Item Type:
Journal Article
Journal or Publication Title:
Social Choice and Welfare
Additional Information:
The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00355-016-0995-7
Uncontrolled Keywords:
/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/3300/3301
Subjects:
?? PROPORTIONAL ELECTIONSSTRATEGIC VOTERSINCOMPLETE INFORMATIONDUVERGER’S HYPOTHESISPOISSON GAMESGAMSON’S LAWECONOMICS AND ECONOMETRICSSOCIAL SCIENCES (MISCELLANEOUS)D72 ??
ID Code:
81523
Deposited By:
Deposited On:
12 Sep 2016 14:30
Refereed?:
Yes
Published?:
Published
Last Modified:
21 Sep 2023 02:07