Systematic literature search, review and dissemination methodology for the COVID-19 pandemic

Reynard, C. and Darbyshire, D. and Prager, G. and Jafar, A.J.N. and Naguib, M. and Oliver, G. and Van Den Berg, P. and Body, R. and Ambroziak, H. and Carley, S. (2021) Systematic literature search, review and dissemination methodology for the COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ Simulation and Technology Enhanced Learning, 7 (6). pp. 524-527. ISSN 2056-6697

Text (Filtering the Firehouse of COVID_revision4 plus figures)
Filtering_the_Firehouse_of_COVID_revision4_plus_figures.docx - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial.
Download (128kB)

Abstract

Purpose of the study: SARS-CoV-2 has caused healthcare systems globally to reorganise. A pandemic paradox emerged; while clinicians were desperate for information on a new disease, they had less time to find and evaluate the vast volume of publications at times of significant strain on healthcare systems. A multidisciplinary team undertook a weekly literature search capturing all COVID-19 publications. We also monitored free open access medical education (FOAMed) sources for emerging themes. Title and abstract screening pooled the most relevant papers for emergency medicine. Three summary types were created, a â Top 5 Flash Update', a journal club and a rapid response to emerging FOAMed themes. From these summaries, three modes of dissemination were used: short written summaries, blogs and podcasts. These were amplified through social media. Study design: A retrospective review was conducted assessing the impact of this knowledge dissemination strategy for the period of March to September 2020. Results: In total, 64 687 papers were identified and screened. Of the papers included in the â Top 5', 28.3% were on epidemiology, 23.6% treatment, 16.7% diagnostics, 12% prognosis, 8.7% pathophysiology with the remaining 10.7% consisting of PPE, public health, well-being and â other'. We published 37 blogs, 17 podcasts and 18 Top 5 Flash Updates. The blogs were read 138 343 times, the Top 5 Flash Updates 68 610 times and the podcasts had 72 501 listens. Conclusion: A combination of traditional academic and novel social media approaches can address the pandemic paradox clinicians are facing.