Ensemble Prospectism

Kaivanto, Kim Kaleva (2016) Ensemble Prospectism. Working Paper. Lancaster University, Department of Economics, Lancaster.

[thumbnail of LancasterWP2016_021]
PDF (LancasterWP2016_021)

Download (209kB)


Incomplete preferences displaying ‘mildly sweetened’ structure are common, yet theoretically problematic. This paper examines the properties of the rankings induced by the set of all coherent completions of the mildly sweetened partial preference structure. Building on these properties, I propose an ensemble-based refinement of Hare’s (Analysis 70:237–247, 2010) prospectism criterion for rational choice when preferences are incomplete. Importantly, this ensemble-based refinement is immune to Peterson’s (Theory & Decision 78:451–456, 2015) weak money pump argument. Hence, ensemble prospectism ensures outcome rationality. Furthermore, by recognizing the structural isomorphism between mildly sweetened preference structures and Cover’s splitting rule in Blackwell’s Pick the Largest Number problem (Ann Math Stat 22:393–399, 1951), ensemble prospectism can be shown to yield better-than-even odds of selecting the expost higher-utility option – despite the absence of all-things-considered preferences ex ante.

Item Type:
Monograph (Working Paper)
?? prospectismrefinementmoney pumpoutcome rationalityensemble methodvoting rulesincomplete preferencesmildly sweetened preferencescover ruleharepetersond81 ??
ID Code:
Deposited By:
Deposited On:
19 Dec 2016 16:56
Last Modified:
08 Jul 2024 23:19