Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Wave–Wind Energy Platforms : Classification, Performance Trade-Offs, and Optimization Implications

Zaylaee, Amani and Michailides, Constantine and Wang, Ziwei and Aggidis, George and Ma, Xiandong (2026) Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Wave–Wind Energy Platforms : Classification, Performance Trade-Offs, and Optimization Implications. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering (JMSE), 1103 (14): 14. ISSN 2077-1312

Text (JMSE_Review_Hybrid_Wave_Wind_Platforms_Zaylaee)
JMSE_Review_Hybrid_Wave_Wind_Platforms_Zaylaee.docx - Submitted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

Abstract

Offshore renewable energy is widely recognised as a critical pathway for decarbonising electricity systems, but the integration of floating offshore wind turbines with wave energy converters remains technically challenging. This paper presents a structured literature review of hybrid wave–wind offshore energy platforms, drawing on 114 reviewed sources published between 2000 and 2026. The review classifies hybrid concepts using a three-axis framework based on floating platform type, wave energy converter (WEC) integration approach, and energy-dominance category. It then compares representative configurations, including point absorbers, oscillating water columns, flap-type devices, and heaving torus concepts, with emphasis on hydrodynamic response, energy contribution, structural complexity, mooring implications, validation status, and optimization suitability. The findings show that no single hybrid configuration can be ranked as universally superior because reported performance depends strongly on platform geometry, WEC scale, site wave climate, modelling assumptions, and validation maturity. Point absorber systems offer modularity and lower integration complexity, oscillating water column (OWC)-based systems provide protected power take-off (PTO) integration and moderate hydrodynamic interaction, flap-type systems can provide stronger motion-control potential but impose higher structural and mooring demands, and spar–torus concepts remain geometrically compatible with spar platforms but are generally wind-dominated. The review further shows that optimization method selection should depend on problem class: gradient-based methods are most suitable for local PTO tuning, evolutionary methods for non-convex multi-objective layout problems, surrogate-based methods for high-cost coupled simulations, and data-driven methods for adaptive control. The paper concludes that future progress requires standardized benchmark models, transparent evidence-level reporting, multi-physics co-optimization, techno-economic assessment, and systematic experimental or field validation before definitive concept ranking or commercial-readiness claims can be made. For decision-makers, industry stakeholders, and policymakers, the framework supports early-stage concept screening, identification of technology-specific risk factors, prioritisation of validation and investment pathways, and alignment of hybrid-platform development with site conditions, infrastructure constraints, and policy objectives.