Validity of resting heart rate derived from contact-based smartphone photoplethysmography (PPG) compared with electrocardiography (ECG) : A 2024 updated systematic review and meta-analysis of correlation coefficients

Mather, James D. and Sculthorpe, Nicholas F. and Mair, Jacqueline L. and Hayes, Lawrence (2024) Validity of resting heart rate derived from contact-based smartphone photoplethysmography (PPG) compared with electrocardiography (ECG) : A 2024 updated systematic review and meta-analysis of correlation coefficients. Other. UNSPECIFIED.

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Background: Mobile health (mHealth), the use of mobile devices for promotion or measurement of health is on the rise. Smartphone cameras can perform photoplethysmography (PPG) for the assessment of heart rate (HR) and other cardiac cycle characteristics. However, rigorous validity is necessary before smartphone measurement of PPG can be utilized for healthcare provision. Objective: We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the validity (determined by correlation coefficients) of resting heart rate (RHR) acquisition from PPG utilizing contact-based smartphone devices versus electrocardiogram as the gold standard. Methods: ScienceDirect, PubMed and SPORTDiscus were searched for relevant studies between January 1st, 2007, and November 6th, 2022. The analysis was carried out using the Fisher r-to-z transformed correlation coefficient as the outcome measure with a random-effects model. Results: In total, eight articles with nine datasets were included. All studies exhibited good to very strong and correlations ranging from r = .98 to 1. This resulted in a Fisher r-to-z transformed correlation coefficient of 3.60 (95% CI = 2.87 to 4.32; z = 9.71, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Smartphone applications measuring RHR derived from contact-based smartphone PPG correlated to ECG with a very strong magnitude in healthy subjects. Yet, agreement was established under highly controlled conditions and these data require replication in clinical populations for its true applicability to be justified. Clinical Trial: N/A

Item Type:
Monograph (Other)
Uncontrolled Keywords:
Research Output Funding/no_not_funded
Subjects:
?? no - not fundedno ??
ID Code:
224508
Deposited By:
Deposited On:
11 Nov 2024 13:50
Refereed?:
No
Published?:
Published
Last Modified:
26 Dec 2024 01:53