Does better than expected life expectancy in areas of disadvantage indicate health resilience? : Stakeholder perspectives and possible explanations

Mead, R. and Rinaldi, C. and McGill, E. and Egan, M. and Popay, J. and Hartwell, G. and Daras, K. and Edwards, A. and Lhussier, M. (2024) Does better than expected life expectancy in areas of disadvantage indicate health resilience? : Stakeholder perspectives and possible explanations. Health and Place, 87: 103242. ISSN 1353-8292

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Some places have better than expected health trends despite being disadvantaged in other ways. Thematic analysis of qualitative data from stakeholders (N = 25) in two case studies of disadvantaged local authorities the North West and South East of England assessed explanations for the localities’ apparent health resilience. Participants identified ways of working that might contribute to improved life expectancy, such as partnering with third sector, targeting and outcome driven action. Stakeholders were reluctant to assume credit for better-than-expected health outcomes. External factors such as population change, national politics and finances were considered crucial. Local public health stakeholders regard their work as important but unlikely to cause place-centred health resilience.

Item Type:
Journal Article
Journal or Publication Title:
Health and Place
Uncontrolled Keywords:
/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/3300/3306
Subjects:
?? health inequalitiespartnershipplace-basedpolicyresiliencearticleclinical outcomedisease burdenfinancehealth disparityhumanincomelife expectancypoliticspsychological resiliencetrend studyvulnerable populationhealth(social science)public health, environment ??
ID Code:
219776
Deposited By:
Deposited On:
14 May 2024 11:05
Refereed?:
Yes
Published?:
Published
Last Modified:
26 Sep 2024 12:26