Bilen, Eren and Matros, Alexander (2023) The Queen's Gambit : Explaining the superstar effect using evidence from chess. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 215. pp. 307-324. ISSN 0167-2681
Restricted to Repository staff only until 28 September 2026.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
Download (0B)
Restricted to Repository staff only until 28 September 2026.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
Download (0B)
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (0B)
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (0B)
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (0B)
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (0B)
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (0B)
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (0B)
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (0B)
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (0B)
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (0B)
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (0B)
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (0B)
Superstar_Effect_JEBO.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)
Abstract
Superstars exist in classrooms and workplaces. Superstars can intimidate others and create a negative performance shock, or they can encourage others by inspiring everybody to “step up their game.” In this study, we examine two effects: the impact of head-to-head competition with a superstar (direct) effect and the influence of a superstar presence on players' performance (indirect) effect. We find that the direct superstar effect in theory and in the data is always negative. The indirect superstar effect is neutral in theory, but depends on the intensity of the superstar in the data: if the skill gap between the superstar and the rest is small (large), there is a positive (negative) indirect effect.