Schiettekatte, Nina M. D. and Brandl, Simon J. and Casey, Jordan M. and Graham, Nicholas A. J. and Barneche, Diego R. and Burkepile, Deron E. and Allgeier, Jacob E. and Arias-Gonzaléz, Jesús E. and Edgar, Graham J. and Ferreira, Carlos E. L. and Floeter, Sergio R. and Friedlander, Alan M. and Green, Alison L. and Kulbicki, Michel and Letourneur, Yves and Luiz, Osmar J. and Mercière, Alexandre and Morat, Fabien and Munsterman, Katrina S. and Rezende, Enrico L. and Rodríguez‐Zaragoza, Fabian A. and Stuart-Smith, Rick D. and Vigliola, Laurent and Villéger, Sébastien and Parravicini, Valeriano (2022) Biological trade-offs underpin coral reef ecosystem functioning. Nature Ecology and Evolution, 6 (6). pp. 701-708. ISSN 2397-334X
Schiettekatte_global_functions_Accepted_MS.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Other.
Download (3MB)
Abstract
Human impact increasingly alters global ecosystems, often reducing biodiversity and disrupting the provision of essential ecosystem services to humanity. Therefore, preserving ecosystem functioning is a critical challenge of the twenty-first century. Coral reefs are declining worldwide due to the pervasive effects of climate change and intensive fishing, and although research on coral reef ecosystem functioning has gained momentum, most studies rely on simplified proxies, such as fish biomass. This lack of quantitative assessments of multiple process-based ecosystem functions hinders local and regional conservation efforts. Here we combine global coral reef fish community surveys and bioenergetic models to quantify five key ecosystem functions mediated by coral reef fishes. We show that functions exhibit critical trade-offs driven by varying community structures, such that no community can maximize all functions. Furthermore, functions are locally dominated by few species, but the identity of dominant species substantially varies at the global scale. In fact, half of the 1,110 species in our dataset are functionally dominant in at least one location. Our results reinforce the need for a nuanced, locally tailored approach to coral reef conservation that considers multiple ecological functions beyond the effect of standing stock biomass.