'An error is feedback’:the experience of communication error management in crisis negotiations

Oostinga, Miriam and Giebels, Ellen and Taylor, Paul Jonathon (2018) 'An error is feedback’:the experience of communication error management in crisis negotiations. Police Practice and Research, 19 (1). pp. 17-30. ISSN 1561-4263

PDF (Communication_error_management_in_crisis_negotiations_Final)
Communication_error_management_in_crisis_negotiations_Final.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial.

Download (536kB)


A range of studies have examined what should be said and done in crisis negotiations. Yet, no study to date has considered what happens when an error is made, how to respond to an error, and what the consequences of errors and responses might be on the negotiation process itself. To develop our understanding of errors, we conducted 11 semi-structured interviews with police crisis negotiators in the Netherlands. Negotiators reported making errors of three types: factual, judgment, or contextual. They also reported making use of four types of response strategy: accept, apologize, attribute, and contradict. Critically, the negotiators did not perceive errors as solely detrimental, but as an opportunity for feedback. They advocated for an error management approach, which focused on what could be learned from another person’s errors when looking back at them. Suggestions for improvement of the communication error management experience in crisis negotiations are discussed.

Item Type:
Journal Article
Journal or Publication Title:
Police Practice and Research
Additional Information:
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Police Practice and Research on 22/05/2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/15614263.2017.1326007
Uncontrolled Keywords:
ID Code:
Deposited By:
Deposited On:
21 Apr 2017 10:30
Last Modified:
22 Nov 2022 04:36