Social vulnerability to climatic shocks is shaped by urban accessibility

Parry, Luke Thomas Wyn and Davies, Gemma and Almeida, Oriana and Frausin Bustamante, Gina Giovanna and de Moraés, Andre and Rivero, Sergio and Filizola, Naziano and Torres, Patricia (2018) Social vulnerability to climatic shocks is shaped by urban accessibility. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 108 (1). pp. 125-143. ISSN 0004-5608

[img]
Preview
PDF (ProofsR2_18April2017)
ProofsR2_18April2017.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial.

Download (3MB)

Abstract

Despite growing interest in urban vulnerability to climatic change, there is no systematic understanding of why some urban centers have greater social vulnerability than others. In this article, we ask whether the social vulnerability of Amazonian cities to floods and droughts is linked to differences in their spatial accessibility. To assess the accessibility of 310 urban centers, we developed a travel network and derived measures of connectivity and geographical remoteness. We found that 914,654 people live in roadless urban centers (n = 68) located up to 2,820km from their state capital. We then tested whether accessibility measures explained interurban differences in quantitative measures of social sensitivity, adaptive capacity, and an overlooked risk area, food system sensitivity. Accessibility explained marked variation in indicators of each of these dimensions and, hence, for the first time, we show an underlying spatial basis for social vulnerability. For instance, floods pose a greater disease risk in less accessible urban centers because inadequate sanitation in these places exposes inhabitants to environmental pollution and contaminated water, exacerbated by poverty and governance failures. Exploring the root causes of these spatial inequalities, we show how remote and roadless cities in Amazonia have been historically marginalized and their citizens exposed to structural violence and economic disadvantage. Paradoxically, we found that places with the highest social vulnerability have the greatest natural and cultural assets (rainforest, indigenous peoples, and protected areas). We conclude that increasing accessibility through road building would be maladaptive, exposing marginalized people to further harm and exacerbating climatic change by driving deforestation.

Item Type:
Journal Article
Journal or Publication Title:
Annals of the Association of American Geographers
Additional Information:
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Annals of the American Association of Geographers on 22/06/2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/24694452.2017.1325726
Uncontrolled Keywords:
/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/3300/3305
Subjects:
ID Code:
85935
Deposited By:
Deposited On:
19 Apr 2017 09:32
Refereed?:
Yes
Published?:
Published
Last Modified:
25 Sep 2020 03:04