Marx, Romanticism and the Importance of Superstructure in Evaluating Progress

Johnson, Matthew Thomas (2017) Marx, Romanticism and the Importance of Superstructure in Evaluating Progress. International Critical Thought, 7 (2). pp. 205-218. ISSN 2159-8282

[thumbnail of Johnson_Final]
PDF (Johnson_Final)
Johnson_Final.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial.

Download (301kB)


Marx’s development and deployment of a teleological account of history derived, in part, from Hegelian tenets has been central to modern notions of progress. This stands in contrast to Rousseau’s romanticism, which holds that human well-being declines as technology advances. In this article, I challenge these two positions through engagement with the case of Aboriginal Australian societies. I explore the possibility that an appreciation of the intricacies of societies demeaned as “primitive,” can lead Marxian and Rousseauian tenets to affirm those societies, but for reasons that Marx and Rousseau may not have originally appreciated. In light of the cultural or superstructural problems caused by modes of production, there may be grounds to appreciate the achievements of societies, which have actively rejected apparently essential means of progress, such as agriculture.

Item Type:
Journal Article
Journal or Publication Title:
International Critical Thought
Additional Information:
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in International Critical Thought on 07/06/2017, available online:
?? marxromanticismprogressdevelopment ??
ID Code:
Deposited By:
Deposited On:
13 Apr 2017 14:00
Last Modified:
15 Jul 2024 16:55