Registered Replication Report : Strack, Martin, & Stepper (1988)

Wagenmakers, E. J. and Beek, Titia and Dijkhoff, Laura and Gronau, Quentin F. and Acosta, A. and Adams, R. B. and Albohn, D. N. and Allard, E. S. and Benning, S. D. and Blouin-Hudon, E. M. and Bulnes, L. C. and Caldwell, T. L. and Calin-Jageman, R. J. and Capaldi, C. A. and Carfagno, N. S. and Chasten, K. T. and Cleeremans, A. and Connell, L. and DeCicco, J. M. and Dijkstra, K. and Foroni, F. and Hess, U. and Holmes, K. J. and Klein, O. and Koch, C. and Korb, S. and Lewinski, P. and Lund, S. and Lupiáñez, J. and Lynott, D. and Oosterwijk, S. and Özdoğru, A. A. and Pacheco-Unguetti, A. P. and Pearson, B. and Powis, C. and Riding, S. and Rumiati, R. I. and Senden, M. and Shea-Shumsky, N. B. and Sobocko, K. and Soto, J. A. and Steiner, T. G. and Talarico, J. M. and van Allen, Z. M. and Vandekerckhove, M. and Wainwright, B. and Wayand, J. F. and Zeelenberg, R. and Zetzer, E. E. and Zwaan, R. A. (2016) Registered Replication Report : Strack, Martin, & Stepper (1988). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11 (6). pp. 917-928. ISSN 1745-6916

[thumbnail of Wagenmakers-Lynott-Connell-etAl-2016-StrackRRRFacialFeedbackPrePub]
PDF (Wagenmakers-Lynott-Connell-etAl-2016-StrackRRRFacialFeedbackPrePub)
Wagenmakers_Lynott_Connell_etAl_2016_StrackRRRFacialFeedbackPrePub.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (550kB)


According to the facial feedback hypothesis, people’s affective responses can be influenced by their own facial expression (e.g., smiling, pouting), even when their expression did not result from their emotional experiences. For example, Strack, Martin, and Stepper (1988) instructed participants to rate the funniness of cartoons using a pen that they held in their mouth. In line with the facial feedback hypothesis, when participants held the pen with their teeth (inducing a “smile”), they rated the cartoons as funnier than when they held the pen with their lips (inducing a “pout”). This seminal study of the facial feedback hypothesis has not been replicated directly. This Registered Replication Report describes the results of 17 independent direct replications of Study 1 from Strack et al. (1988), all of which followed the same vetted protocol. A meta-analysis of these studies examined the difference in funniness ratings between the “smile” and “pout” conditions. The original Strack et al. (1988) study reported a rating difference of 0.82 units on a 10-point Likert scale. Our meta-analysis revealed a rating difference of 0.03 units with a 95% confidence interval ranging from −0.11 to 0.16.

Item Type:
Journal Article
Journal or Publication Title:
Perspectives on Psychological Science
Additional Information:
The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Perspectives in Psychological Science, 11 (6), 2016, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2016 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Perspectives in Psychological Science page: on SAGE Journals Online:
Uncontrolled Keywords:
?? facial feedback hypothesismany-labspreregistrationreplicationgeneral psychologypsychology(all) ??
ID Code:
Deposited By:
Deposited On:
05 Jan 2017 09:06
Last Modified:
16 Jul 2024 23:50