Polemic, Parliament and History:Michael Foot versus David Owen

Garnett, Mark Allan (2016) Polemic, Parliament and History:Michael Foot versus David Owen. Parliamentary History, 35 (2). pp. 171-188. ISSN 0264-2824

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Michael Foot had good reasons for resenting Dr David Owen, who played a prominent role in the formation of the breakaway Social Democratic Party (SDP) while Foot was Labour's leader. In Loyalists and Loners (1986), a book of political pen-portraits, Foot duly delivered a blistering attack on Owen, focusing on two charges – that Owen was consumed by personal ambition from an early stage of his career, and that he was an ideological turncoat who had wilfully misused the word ‘socialism’. The present article examines Foot's allegations in the light of various historical sources, including the private papers of both protagonists. It is argued that, though Foot's charges seem devastating at first sight – and have never been refuted by Owen or his admirers – they cannot be sustained after an impartial review of the evidence. This reappraisal provides new insights into Owen's remarkable and controversial career at two pivotal stages – his initial rise to ministerial office, and his decision to leave Labour.

Item Type:
Journal Article
Journal or Publication Title:
Parliamentary History
Uncontrolled Keywords:
/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/1200/1202
Subjects:
ID Code:
80246
Deposited By:
Deposited On:
22 Jun 2019 07:33
Refereed?:
Yes
Published?:
Published
Last Modified:
13 Feb 2020 14:50