Ceci n’est pas un argument appropré (this is not a proper argument)

Harris, Geraldine Mary (2016) Ceci n’est pas un argument appropré (this is not a proper argument). Studies in Theatre and Performance, 36 (1). pp. 52-57. ISSN 1468-2761

[img]
Preview
PDF (Ceci n’est pas un argument appropré (this is not a proper argument))
harrisG.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial.

Download (260kB)

Abstract

This provocation poses questions of various sizes ‘inspired’ by some of the written publications that have theorised the concept of Practice as Research and drawing on lessons learnt from supervising PhD’s (with and without PaR). It consists of ‘musing’ rather than a proper argument and makes reference to feminism. Some readers might find both of these things very irritating. Throughout the course of its musing, questions asked include: ‘Is it acceptable to start a sentence with ‘And’ in academic writing?; ‘What does and does not have the status of ‘theory’? And who does and does not have the status of a theorist? and ‘What is a proper argument?’ No answers are provided and no conclusions drawn.

Item Type:
Journal Article
Journal or Publication Title:
Studies in Theatre and Performance
Additional Information:
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Studies in Theatre and Performance on 17/11/2015, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14682761.2015.1111012
Uncontrolled Keywords:
/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/1200/1213
Subjects:
ID Code:
79198
Deposited By:
Deposited On:
28 Apr 2016 12:22
Refereed?:
Yes
Published?:
Published
Last Modified:
29 Nov 2020 03:33