Justice and conservation : the need to incorporate recognition

Martin, Adrian and Coolsaet, Brendan and Corbera, Esteve and Dawson, Neil and Fraser, James Angus and Lehmann, Ina and Rodriguez, Iokiñe (2016) Justice and conservation : the need to incorporate recognition. Biological Conservation, 197. pp. 254-261. ISSN 0006-3207

[thumbnail of Justice_and_Conservation_pre-print]
Preview
PDF (Justice_and_Conservation_pre-print)
Justice_and_Conservation_pre_print.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs.

Download (468kB)

Abstract

In light of the Aichi target to manage protected areas equitably by 2020, we ask how the conservation sector should be incorporating concerns for social justice. We focus in particular on ‘recognition’, because it is the least well understood aspect of environmental justice, and yet highly relevant to conservation because of its concern with respect for local knowledge and cultures. In order to explore the meaning of recognition in the conservation context, we take four main steps. First, we identify four components of recognition to serve as our analytical framework: subjects of justice, the harms that constitute injustice, the mechanisms that produce injustices, and the responses to alleviate these. Secondly, we apply this framework to explore four traditions of thinking about recognition: Hegelian intersubjectivity, critical theory, southern decolonial theory, and the capabilities approach. Thirdly, we provide three case studies of conservation conflicts highlighting how different theoretical perspectives are illustrated in the claims and practices of real world conservation struggles. Fourthly, we finish the paper by drawing out some key differences between traditions of thinking, but also important areas of convergence. The convergences provide a basis for concluding that conservation should look beyond a distributive model of justice to incorporate concerns for social recognition, including careful attention to ways to pursue equality of status for local conservation stakeholders. This will require reflection on working practices and looking at forms of intercultural engagement that, for example, respect alternative ways of relating to nature and biodiversity.

Item Type:
Journal Article
Journal or Publication Title:
Biological Conservation
Additional Information:
This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Biological Conservation. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Biological Conservation, 197, 2016 DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.03.021
Uncontrolled Keywords:
/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/1100/1105
Subjects:
?? environmental justiceequityprotected areasaichi targetsbiodiversity conservationecology, evolution, behavior and systematicsnature and landscape conservation ??
ID Code:
79005
Deposited By:
Deposited On:
13 Apr 2016 10:10
Refereed?:
Yes
Published?:
Published
Last Modified:
21 Sep 2024 00:39