A survival analysis of Islamic and conventional banks

Pappas, Vasileios and Ongena, Steven and Izzeldin, Marwan and Fuertes, Ana-Maria (2016) A survival analysis of Islamic and conventional banks. Journal of Financial Services Research, 51 (2). pp. 221-256. ISSN 0920-8550

[img]
Preview
PDF (Survival Paper v21-9-15 - JFSR_AM)
Survival_Paper_v21_9_15_JFSR_AM.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB)

Abstract

Are Islamic banks inherently more stable than conventional banks? We address this question by applying a survival analysis based on the Cox proportional hazard model to a comprehensive sample of 421 banks in 20 Middle and Far Eastern countries from 1995 to 2010. By comparing the failure risk for both bank types, we find that Islamic banks have a significantly lower risk of failure than that of their conventional peers. This lower risk is based both unconditionally and conditionally on bank-specific (microeconomic) variables as well as macroeconomic and market structure variables. Our findings indicate that the design and implementation of early warning systems for bank failure should recognize the distinct risk profiles of the two bank types.

Item Type:
Journal Article
Journal or Publication Title:
Journal of Financial Services Research
Additional Information:
The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10693-016-0239-0
Uncontrolled Keywords:
/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/1400/1402
Subjects:
ID Code:
78344
Deposited By:
Deposited On:
25 Feb 2016 11:40
Refereed?:
Yes
Published?:
Published
Last Modified:
07 Apr 2020 03:42