Variability in second language learning:the roles of individual differences, learning conditions, and linguistic complexity

Tagarelli, Kaitlyn and Ruiz Hernandez, Simon and Moreno Vega, Jose and Rebuschat, Patrick Emanuel (2016) Variability in second language learning:the roles of individual differences, learning conditions, and linguistic complexity. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38 (Specia). pp. 293-316. ISSN 0272-2631

[img]
Preview
PDF (Tagarelli et al-SSLA-FINALfordistr)
Tagarelli_et_al_SSLA_FINALfordistr.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial.

Download (583kB)

Abstract

Second language learning outcomes are highly variable, due to a variety of factors, including individual differences, exposure conditions, and linguistic complexity. However, exactly how these factors interact to influence language learning is unknown. This paper examines the relationship between these three variables in language learners. Native English speakers were exposed to an artificial language containing three sentence patterns of varying linguistic complexity. They were randomly assigned to two groups – incidental and instructed – designed to promote the acquisition of implicit and explicit knowledge, respectively. Learning was assessed with a grammaticality judgment task, while subjective measures of awareness were used to measure whether exposure had resulted in implicit or explicit knowledge. Participants also completed cognitive tests. Awareness measures demonstrated that learners in the incidental group relied more on implicit knowledge, whereas learners in the instructed group relied more on explicit knowledge. Overall, exposure condition was the most significant predictor of performance on the grammaticality judgment task, with learners in the instructed group outperforming those in the incidental group. Performance on a procedural learning task accounted for additional variance. When outcomes were analysed according to linguistic complexity, exposure condition was the most significant predictor for two syntactic patterns, but it was not a predictor for the most complex sentence group; instead, procedural learning ability was.

Item Type:
Journal Article
Journal or Publication Title:
Studies in Second Language Acquisition
Additional Information:
http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=sla The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Studies in Second Language Acquisition,38 (2), pp 293-316 2016, © 2016 Cambridge University Press.
Uncontrolled Keywords:
/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/1200/1203
Subjects:
ID Code:
77768
Deposited By:
Deposited On:
06 Jun 2016 10:04
Refereed?:
Yes
Published?:
Published
Last Modified:
07 Apr 2020 03:36