McLatchie, Neil Marvin and Giner-Sorolla, Roger and Derbyshire, Stuart (2016) ‘Imagined guilt’ versus ‘recollected guilt’ : implications for fMRI. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11 (5). pp. 703-711. ISSN 1749-5016
McLatchie_et_al_in_press_Guilty_thoughts_Guilty_feelings_fMRI.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (175kB)
Soc_Cogn_Affect_Neurosci_2016_Mclatchie_scan_nsw001.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (717kB)
Abstract
Guilt is thought to maintain social harmony by motivating reparation (Haidt, 2003; Trivers, 1971). The present study compared two methodologies commonly used to identify the neural correlates of guilt. The first, imagined guilt, requires participants to read hypothetical scenarios and then imagine themselves as the protagonist. The second, recollected guilt, requires participants to reflect on times they personally experienced guilt. In the fMRI scanner, participants were presented with guilt/neutral memories and guilt/neutral hypothetical scenarios. Contrasts confirmed a priori predictions that guilt memories, relative to guilt scenarios, were associated with significantly greater activity in regions associated with affect (ACC, Caudate, Insula, OFC) and social cognition (TP, precuneus). Similarly, results indicated that guilt memories, relative to neutral memories, were also associated with greater activity in affective (ACC, amygdala, Insula, OFC) and social cognition (mPFC, TP, precuneus, TPJ) regions. There were no significant differences between guilt hypothetical scenarios and neutral hypothetical scenarios in either affective or social cognition regions. The importance of distinguishing between different guilt inductions inside the scanner are discussed. We offer explanations of our results and discuss ideas for future research.