Inflated responses in measures of self-assessed health

Greene, William H. and Harris, Mark and Hollingsworth, Bruce (2015) Inflated responses in measures of self-assessed health. American Journal of Health Economics, 1 (4). pp. 461-493. ISSN 2332-3493

[thumbnail of AJHE paper Re-submission 15 Sept 2014 FINAL]
PDF (AJHE paper Re-submission 15 Sept 2014 FINAL)
AJHE_paper_Re_submission_15_Sept_2014_FINAL.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB)


This paper focuses on the self-reported responses given to survey questions of the form “Overall, how would you rate your health?” with typical response items being on a scale ranging from poor to excellent. Usually, the overwhelming majority of responses fall in either the middle category or the one immediately to the “right” of this (for example, good and very good). However, based on a wide range of other medical indicators, such favorable responses appear to paint an overly rosy picture of true health. The hypothesis here is that these “middle” responses have been, in some sense, inflated. That is, for whatever reason, a significant number of responders inaccurately report into these categories. Our results do indeed suggest that such inflation is present in these categories. Adjusted responses to these questions could lead to significant changes in policy, and should be reflected upon when analyzing and interpreting these scales.

Item Type:
Journal Article
Journal or Publication Title:
American Journal of Health Economics
Additional Information:
Inflated Responses in Measures of Self-Assessed Health William H. Greene, Mark N. Harris, and Bruce Hollingsworth American Journal of Health Economics 2015 1:4, 461-493 © 2015 The MIT Press
ID Code:
Deposited By:
Deposited On:
25 Apr 2016 10:10
Last Modified:
18 Dec 2023 01:30