The implications of counterfactual mind-sets for the functioning of implementation intentions

McCulloch, Kathleen Cameron and Smallman, Rachel (2014) The implications of counterfactual mind-sets for the functioning of implementation intentions. Motivation and Emotion, 38 (5). pp. 635-644. ISSN 0146-7239

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Two experiments explored how counterfactual mind-sets interact with implementation intentions and affect their flexibility. Participants engaged in a subtractive mind-set, an additive mind-set, or a control condition and were subsequently given either goal intentions or implementation intentions that facilitated cue detection (Experiment 1) or the goal-directed response (Experiment 2). Dependent variables were the number of targets specified in the intentions and the legitimate alternatives to the targets (flexibility measure). In Experiment 1, the implementation intention (versus goal intention) group were better at detecting specified cues, but worse on alternatives, regardless of mind-set. In Experiment 2, an interaction emerged. For both specified and alternative responses, the subtractive mind-set paired with an implementation intention versus goal intention performed better. This pattern was reversed for additive mind-set conditions. Hence, how counterfactual mind-sets affect the flexibility of planning is dependent on the particular mind-set used and the specific operations of plan.

Item Type:
Journal Article
Journal or Publication Title:
Motivation and Emotion
Uncontrolled Keywords:
/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/3200/3205
Subjects:
ID Code:
70411
Deposited By:
Deposited On:
15 Aug 2014 09:59
Refereed?:
Yes
Published?:
Published
Last Modified:
01 Jan 2020 08:57