Discussion of Financial reporting for employee stock options:liabilities or equity

Peasnell, Ken (2013) Discussion of Financial reporting for employee stock options:liabilities or equity. Review of Accounting Studies, 18 (3). pp. 683-691. ISSN 1380-6653

Full text not available from this repository.


Barth, Hodder, and Stubben examine how the risk and expected return of existing shares varies as a function of the amount of outstanding employee stock options (ESOs), finding that the association is a negative one, consistent with ESOs being equity-like in character. They suggest that their approach could be used to address the question of how best to characterize other complex financial claims. The study is well executed and provides a thought-provoking contribution to the debate. However, it is far from obvious that the ‘‘debt or equity’’ question can be solved in this manner. Their approach effectively defines a liability as a financial claim that has characteristics akin to fixed-rate debt. I provide examples of the limitations of this perspective, starting by comparing ESOs that are settled with shares with those settled in cash. Whether a claim is treated as a liability or equity is of little con- sequence if it is simply a matter of balance sheet presentation. The real question is the implications for income measurement. I suggest progress might best be made if we start with Penman’s proposal that assets and liabilities be separated into oper- ating and financial items, an approach which would include many claims that have equity-like characteristics, such as unvested ESOs, within the operating liability category. Once a claim ceases to be an operating item—e.g. when an ESO vests—the approach suggested in the paper can then be used to determine how it should be classified.

Item Type:
Journal Article
Journal or Publication Title:
Review of Accounting Studies
Uncontrolled Keywords:
ID Code:
Deposited By:
Deposited On:
21 Aug 2013 10:38
Last Modified:
22 Nov 2022 00:07