Divine Hoorays : Some Parallels Between Expressivism and Religious Ethics.

Unwin, Nicholas (2006) Divine Hoorays : Some Parallels Between Expressivism and Religious Ethics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 77 (3). pp. 659-684.

[img]
Microsoft Word (Divine_Hoorays.doc)
Divine_Hoorays.doc

Download (151kB)

Abstract

Divine law theories of metaethics claim that moral rightness is grounded in God�s commands, wishes and so forth. Expressivist theories, by contrast, claim that to call something morally right is to express our own attitudes, not to report on God�s. Ostensibly, such views are incompatible. However, we shall argue that a rapprochement is possible and beneficial to both sides. Expressivists need to explain the difference between reporting and expressing an attitude, and to address the Frege-Geach problem. Divine law theorists need to get past the Euthyphro dilemma, and to avoid moral externalism. This paper shows how a combined theory helps us to achieve this.

Item Type:
Journal Article
Journal or Publication Title:
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
Additional Information:
This is a pre-print of an article published in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 77 (3), 2008. (c) Wiley.
Uncontrolled Keywords:
/dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/libraryofcongress/b1
Subjects:
ID Code:
650
Deposited By:
Deposited On:
22 Oct 2007
Refereed?:
Yes
Published?:
Published
Last Modified:
04 Dec 2020 00:53