Divine Hoorays : Some Parallels Between Expressivism and Religious Ethics.

Unwin, Nicholas (2006) Divine Hoorays : Some Parallels Between Expressivism and Religious Ethics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 77 (3). pp. 659-684.

[img] Microsoft Word (Divine_Hoorays.doc)
Divine_Hoorays.doc

Download (151kB)

Abstract

Divine law theories of metaethics claim that moral rightness is grounded in God�s commands, wishes and so forth. Expressivist theories, by contrast, claim that to call something morally right is to express our own attitudes, not to report on God�s. Ostensibly, such views are incompatible. However, we shall argue that a rapprochement is possible and beneficial to both sides. Expressivists need to explain the difference between reporting and expressing an attitude, and to address the Frege-Geach problem. Divine law theorists need to get past the Euthyphro dilemma, and to avoid moral externalism. This paper shows how a combined theory helps us to achieve this.

Item Type: Journal Article
Journal or Publication Title: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
Additional Information: This is a pre-print of an article published in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 77 (3), 2008. (c) Wiley.
Uncontrolled Keywords: /dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/libraryofcongress/b1
Subjects:
Departments: Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences > Politics & International Relations (Merged into PPR 2010-08-01)
ID Code: 650
Deposited By: Dr Nick Unwin
Deposited On: 22 Oct 2007
Refereed?: Yes
Published?: Published
Last Modified: 24 Aug 2019 00:45
URI: https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/650

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item