Working with pluralism: determining quality in qualitative research

Easterby-Smith, M P V and Golden-Biddle, K and Locke, K (2008) Working with pluralism: determining quality in qualitative research. Organizational Research Methods, 11 (3). pp. 419-429. ISSN 1094-4281

[thumbnail of Working with pluralism: determining quality in qualitative research]
Preview
PDF (Working with pluralism: determining quality in qualitative research)
10.pdf - Submitted Version

Download (132kB)

Abstract

This Feature Topic contains four articles that address the determination of quality in qualitative research by exploring the use of criteria from the perspective of reviewers, editors, and/ or authors. In this introductory article, the authors assert that these explorations represent an important move away from employing listings of static criteria to adjudicate and develop qualitative research. In its place, we see the making of quality as situated in methodological pluralism that occurs both in comparison with quantitative research and also within qualitative research. This fact complicates and enriches the task of determining quality and also suggests ways forward for the academic community.

Item Type:
Journal Article
Journal or Publication Title:
Organizational Research Methods
Uncontrolled Keywords:
/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/1400/1408
Subjects:
?? strategy and managementgeneral decision sciencesmanagement of technology and innovationdecision sciences(all)discipline-based research ??
ID Code:
45140
Deposited By:
Deposited On:
11 Jul 2011 18:27
Refereed?:
Yes
Published?:
Published
Last Modified:
05 Sep 2024 00:16