Green groups and grey areas : scientific boundary work, NGOs and environmental knowledge.

Eden, Sally and Donaldson, Andrew and Walker, Gordon P (2006) Green groups and grey areas : scientific boundary work, NGOs and environmental knowledge. Environment and Planning A, 38 (6). pp. 1061-1076. ISSN 0308-518X

[thumbnail of Eden_et_al_2006_EPA.pdf]
Preview
PDF (Eden_et_al_2006_EPA.pdf)
Eden_et_al_2006_EPA.pdf

Download (166kB)

Abstract

In this paper we examine the role of nongovernmental organisations (NGOs) in debates about environmental science and knowledge, using empirical evidence from in-depth interviews with a range of NGOs involved in the waste debate in the United Kingdom. We discuss theoretical issues of scientific boundary-work and the construction of expertise and socially distributed knowledge, and then apply these to our empirical evidence. Our conclusions are that NGOs continue to subscribe to the notion of the preeminent authority of science in environmental debates, but also work partly in a more diverse, highly networked world of knowledge production which requires them to be pragmatic and versatile in how they legitimate knowledge from various sources. Hence, scientific knowledge is highly contingent in its authority, and dependent upon continual (re)negotiation.

Item Type:
Journal Article
Journal or Publication Title:
Environment and Planning A
Uncontrolled Keywords:
/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2300/2301
Subjects:
?? environmental science (miscellaneous)geography, planning and developmentg geography (general) ??
ID Code:
437
Deposited By:
Deposited On:
08 Feb 2007
Refereed?:
Yes
Published?:
Published
Last Modified:
20 Nov 2024 01:31