Impact of standard versus cyclic teriparatide and denosumab treatment on trabecular bone score : a post-hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial

Dash, A.S. and Hind, K. and Hans, D. and Nieves, J. and Cosman, F. (2025) Impact of standard versus cyclic teriparatide and denosumab treatment on trabecular bone score : a post-hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial. Osteoporosis International. ISSN 0937-941X

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

The osteoanabolic effects of teriparatide are maximal in the first 6 months of treatment. This secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial investigated whether cyclic teriparatide would improve Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) more than standard dosing over 36 months. Results showed similar improvements in TBS with both teriparatide regimens. The effects of teriparatide (TPTD) are maximal in the first 6 months when bone formation exceeds resorption to the greatest degree. Cyclic use of TPTD was proposed to try to broaden this anabolic window. Prior results from this study showed that 6-month cycles of TPTD and denosumab did not improve BMD compared to standard dosing with TPTD followed by denosumab. The goal of this study was to determine if there was any difference in trabecular bone score improvement (TBS) with cyclic vs standard therapy. 70 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were randomized to TPTD for 18 months followed by denosumab for 18 months (standard; n = 32) or three cycles of 6 months TPTD, each followed by denosumab (cyclic; n = 32). DXA measurements of the lumbar spine (LS) were performed every 6 months and TBS calculated at baseline, 18 and 36 months on the 50 participants who completed the 36-month final study visit. This paper is a post-hoc analysis of a prior clinical trial looking at BMD change at 36 months for cyclic vs. standard dosing. At baseline, TBS was similar between the 2 groups with mean level 1.24 ± 0.05, considered partially degraded. In the standard group, TBS increased by 1.1% at 18 months (p = 0.11 vs baseline) and 1.6% at 36 months (p < 0.11 vs baseline). In the cyclic group, TBS increased by 2.4% and 2.6% at 18 and 36 months from baseline, respectively (both p < 0.05 vs. baseline). However, there were no group differences in TBS increments at either 18 or 36 months. At 36 months, 17 total participants had improvement in their TBS category from either degraded to partially degraded or partially degraded to normal, or degraded to normal with 4 deteriorations to a lower category. There was no difference between groups in the TBS category change. TBS improved similarly with cyclic and standard treatment regimens of TPTD and denosumab over 36 months, however possible differences may have been masked by inadequate study power. [Abstract copyright: © 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to the International Osteoporosis Foundation and the Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation.]

Item Type:
Journal Article
Journal or Publication Title:
Osteoporosis International
Uncontrolled Keywords:
/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2700/2712
Subjects:
?? endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism ??
ID Code:
232761
Deposited By:
Deposited On:
08 Oct 2025 08:00
Refereed?:
Yes
Published?:
Published
Last Modified:
08 Oct 2025 08:00