A review of alternative finishing options for uranium/plutonium and minor actinide nitrate products from thermal and fast reactor fuels reprocessing

Colledge, H. and Sarsfield, M. and Taylor, R. and Boxall, C. (2023) A review of alternative finishing options for uranium/plutonium and minor actinide nitrate products from thermal and fast reactor fuels reprocessing. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 165: 104903. ISSN 0149-1970

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

In fuel reprocessing, product finishing is the conversion of aqueous metal nitrates into solid forms that can either be re-used in new fuels or safely interim stored and so is the key step at the interface between reprocessing and fuel manufacturing processes. Conversion processes were originally developed for the fabrication of oxide fuels and have typically involved the generation of UO 3 (or U 3O 8) and PuO 2 powders as separate products. However, whilst this is an industrial proven process, research and development of mixed oxide (MOX) fuels and minor actinide targets by advanced reprocessing routes is also underway. It is envisaged that advanced recycle processes will allow the multi-recycling of plutonium and the transmutation of minor actinides into shorter lived isotopes to enhance sustainability of the nuclear fuel cycle and fully utilise fissionable material recoverable from spent fuels whilst improving a number of key features over current conversion processes including: product conversion efficiency, higher throughput, flexibility in product specification, proliferation resistance and a reduction in the number of waste streams produced. Internationally, research programmes to examine future options for advanced fuel cycles are focusing on the development of advanced reprocessing flowsheets for future actinide recycling. It is anticipated that these separation processes will produce a range of mixed transuranic (TRU) actinide nitrate products rather than the separated pure plutonium stream produced in current reprocessing plants. The easiest assumption is that these nitrate products will be converted to oxides by the oxalate co-precipitation route. However, this has certain limitations. The focus of this review is to identify any alternative nitrate to oxide conversion processes which have been applied to mixed oxides and evaluate their suitability for MOX production. A variety of factors including process complexity, technical maturity, effluent treatment/recycling and scale up into an industrial process will also be considered.

Item Type:
Journal Article
Journal or Publication Title:
Progress in Nuclear Energy
Uncontrolled Keywords:
/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2100/2102
Subjects:
?? finishingmoxdenitrationoxalate co-precipitationgelationco-conversionenergy engineering and power technologynuclear energy and engineeringwaste management and disposalsafety, risk, reliability and quality ??
ID Code:
224586
Deposited By:
Deposited On:
02 Oct 2024 13:40
Refereed?:
Yes
Published?:
Published
Last Modified:
02 Oct 2024 13:40