Policing the Enforcers : The Governmentality of Immigration Controls

Consterdine, Erica (2024) Policing the Enforcers : The Governmentality of Immigration Controls. International Political Sociology, 18 (2): olae008. ISSN 1749-5679

Text (IPS_Consterdine proofs) - Draft Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (0B)

Text (IPS_Consterdine proofs) - Draft Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (0B)

Text (IPS_Consterdine proofs) - Draft Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (0B)

Text (IPS_Consterdine proofs) - Draft Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (0B)

Text (IPS_Consterdine proofs) - Draft Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (0B)

Text (IPS_Consterdine proofs)
IPS_Consterdine_proofs.pdf - Draft Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (519kB)

Abstract

As border controls have spanned from the territorial border to the interior, outsourcing controls to non-state actors has become the integral technology in everyday bordering. Whilst the racialized consequences of deputizing controls have been illuminated, the governmentality and biopolitical implications of these outsourcing processes have been overlooked. This paper argues that as the architecture of migration controls has evolved, the targets of control have widened; that migration controls have transcended migrants and are also used as a way to control sovereign subjects. Taking the genealogy of UK immigration control policy as a case study, the paper shows how the processes of outsourcing immigration controls to corporations, public institutions, and the private sphere have inverted the target of control through a governmentality of coercive measures and incentive structures. I argue that in outsourcing controls to nonstate actors, the taken-for-granted boundaries between who is subject to immigration control and who is not are blurred because as sovereign subjects become complicit in borderwork, they also become subject to state violence. The implication is that all subjects become subject to immigration control, provoking the question of who immigration controls serve and to what end.