The Curious Case of Ronald McDonald’s Claim to Rights: An Ontological Account of Differences in Group and Individual Person Rights

Smith, Leonie (2018) The Curious Case of Ronald McDonald’s Claim to Rights: An Ontological Account of Differences in Group and Individual Person Rights. Journal of Social Ontology, 4 (1). ISSN 2196-9663

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Performative accounts of personhood argue that group agents are persons, fit to be held responsible within the social sphere. Nonetheless, these accounts want to retain a moral distinction between group and individual persons. That: (1) Group-persons can be responsible for their actions qua persons, but that (2) group-persons might nonetheless not have rights equivalent to those of human persons. I present an argument which makes sense of this disanalogy, without recourse to normative claims or additional ontological commitments. I instead ground rights in the different relations in which performative persons stand in relation to one another.

Item Type:
Journal Article
Journal or Publication Title:
Journal of Social Ontology
Additional Information:
Winner of the 2016 Essay Competition of the International Social Ontology Society
Uncontrolled Keywords:
Research Output Funding/no_not_funded
Subjects:
?? group personhoodgroup rightssocial ontologyarbitrary powerpersonhoodagencyno - not funded ??
ID Code:
215560
Deposited By:
Deposited On:
04 Mar 2024 14:00
Refereed?:
Yes
Published?:
Published
Last Modified:
16 Jul 2024 00:58