Does value-based prioritization at working memory enhance long-term memory?

Atkinson, A.L. and Waterman, A.H. and Allen, R.J. (2024) Does value-based prioritization at working memory enhance long-term memory? Memory and Cognition. ISSN 0090-502X

Text (Atkinson_et_al_Prioritisation_WM-LTM)
Atkinson_et_al_Prioritisation_WM-LTM.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (924kB)

Abstract

Research has demonstrated that individuals can direct their attention to valuable information in both working memory and long-term memory tasks with observable effects on performance. However, it is currently unclear whether prioritising an item for a working memory task automatically translates into a boost at long-term memory. This was examined in two experiments using relatively short (250 ms per item; Experiment 1) and longer (500 ms per item; Experiment 2) encoding times. Participants first completed a visual working memory task, in which they were presented with series of photographs of everyday objects. Following a brief delay (1,000 ms), they completed a four-alternative forced-choice test. Prior to encoding, participants were informed of the point values associated with each item. In some trials, the first item in the sequence was worth more points than the rest. In other trials, all items were equally valuable. After a filled delay, participants completed a surprise long-term memory task. At working memory, a value effect was reliably observed on recognition accuracy, along with some evidence of faster response times for high-value items. However, there was little consistent evidence of this effect automatically persisting into long-term memory. Thus, the benefits of attentional prioritization in working memory do not always translate into longer-term performance. More broadly, this provides further evidence that manipulations that enhance working memory performance do not necessarily enhance long-term memory.