Potential contribution of vaccination uptake to occupational differences in risk of SARS-CoV- 2 : Analysis of the ONS COVID-19 Infection Survey

Rhodes, S. and Demou, E. and Wilkinson, J. and Cherrie, M. and Edge, R. and Gittins, M. and Katikireddi, S.V. and Kromydas, T. and Mueller, W. and Pearce, N. and Tongeren, M.V. (2024) Potential contribution of vaccination uptake to occupational differences in risk of SARS-CoV- 2 : Analysis of the ONS COVID-19 Infection Survey. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 81. pp. 34-39. ISSN 1351-0711

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Objectives To assess variation in vaccination uptake across occupational groups as a potential explanation for variation in risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Design We analysed data from the UK Office of National Statistics COVID-19 Infection Survey linked to vaccination data from the National Immunisation Management System in England from 1 December 2020 to 11 May 2022. We analysed vaccination uptake and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk by occupational group and assessed whether adjustment for vaccination reduced the variation in risk between occupational groups. Results Estimated rates of triple vaccination were high across all occupational groups (80% or above), but were lowest for food processing (80%), personal care (82%), hospitality (83%), manual occupations (84%) and retail (85%). High rates were observed for individuals working in health (95% for office based, 92% for those in patient-facing roles) and education (91%) and office-based workers not included in other categories (90%). The impact of adjusting for vaccination when estimating relative risks of infection was generally modest (ratio of hazard ratios across all occupational groups reduced from 1.37 to 1.32), but was consistent with the hypothesis that low vaccination rates contribute to elevated risk in some groups. Conclusions Variation in vaccination coverage might account for a modest proportion of occupational differences in infection risk. Vaccination rates were uniformly very high in this cohort, which may suggest that the participants are not representative of the general population. Accordingly, these results should be considered tentative pending the accumulation of additional evidence.

Item Type:
Journal Article
Journal or Publication Title:
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Additional Information:
Export Date: 19 January 2024
Uncontrolled Keywords:
/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2700/2739
Subjects:
?? public health, environmental and occupational health ??
ID Code:
213194
Deposited By:
Deposited On:
19 Jan 2024 15:45
Refereed?:
Yes
Published?:
Published
Last Modified:
16 Jul 2024 00:46