Smith, Leslie (1999) Representation and knowledge are not the same thing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22 (5). pp. 784-785. ISSN 0140-525X
Abstract
Two standard epistemological accounts are conflated in Dienes & Perner's account of knowledge, and this conflation requires the rejection of their four conditions of knowledge. Because their four metarepresentations applied to the explicit-implicit distinction are paired with these conditions, it follows by modus tollens that if the latter are inadequate, then so are the former. Quite simply, their account misses the link between true reasoning and knowledge.
Item Type:
Journal Article
Journal or Publication Title:
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Additional Information:
http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=BBS The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22 (5), pp 784-785 1999, © 1999 Cambridge University Press.
Uncontrolled Keywords:
/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/3300/3310
Subjects:
?? linguistics and languagebehavioral neuroscienceneuropsychology and physiological psychologyphysiologylanguage and linguisticsl education (general) ??
Departments:
ID Code:
20792
Deposited By:
Deposited On:
28 Nov 2008 16:48
Refereed?:
Yes
Published?:
Published
Last Modified:
04 Dec 2024 00:18