Paradox-responding in humanitarian temporary supply networks: exploring strategies and enabling mechanisms

Fernandes, A.R. and Dube, N. (2023) Paradox-responding in humanitarian temporary supply networks: exploring strategies and enabling mechanisms. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 43 (11). pp. 1781-18076. ISSN 0144-3577

[thumbnail of Fernandes_Dube_Paradox_Responding_in_Humanitarian_Temporary_Supply_Networks_Accepted_Version]
Text (Fernandes_Dube_Paradox_Responding_in_Humanitarian_Temporary_Supply_Networks_Accepted_Version)
Fernandes_Dube_Paradox_Responding_in_Humanitarian_Temporary_Supply_Networks_Accepted_Version.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (671kB)

Abstract

Purpose – This study investigates paradox-responding strategies and enabling mechanisms in humanitarian temporary supply networks (TSNs). Given the high stakes involved in life-saving supply networks, understanding how diverse, often under-resourced, organisations jointly tackle paradoxical tensions under time pressure is crucial. Design/methodology/approach – A qualitative single case study approach is adopted and a TSN deployed to meet shelter needs following the 2015 Nepal earthquake is selected as the case. The authors use diverse secondary data sources to establish how the TSN responded to paradoxical tensions. Findings – Results show that paradox-responding in humanitarian TSNs is ongoing, dynamic and a collective effort. Most strategies entail tackling the paradoxical tensions at the same time, using the same TSN structure, but there are differences in the treatment of the paradoxical elements. Additionally, the authors find that the execution of the responding strategies is enabled by the appropriate types of network-level mechanisms which can vary in novelty, complexity, depth and reach. Research limitations/implications – This study provides rich explanations of paradox-responding and develops insights into collective action within TSNs. However, further research is needed to extend and refine insights given the single-case setting design. Practical implications – This study develops a framework of paradox-responding strategies and a corresponding mix of enabling mechanisms that can guide decision-makers in the humanitarian sector when deploying TSNs. Originality/value – To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study that investigates paradox-responding strategies in humanitarian TSNs in particular and enabling mechanisms in general.

Item Type:
Journal Article
Journal or Publication Title:
International Journal of Operations and Production Management
Uncontrolled Keywords:
/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/1400/1408
Subjects:
?? strategy and managementgeneral decision sciencesmanagement of technology and innovationdecision sciences(all) ??
ID Code:
202883
Deposited By:
Deposited On:
31 Aug 2023 12:50
Refereed?:
Yes
Published?:
Published
Last Modified:
21 Nov 2024 01:45