Effects of public policies in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases : A systematic review of global literature

Vellakkal, Sukumar and Khan, Zaky and Alavani, Helan and Fledderjohann, Jasmine and Stuckler, David (2022) Effects of public policies in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases : A systematic review of global literature. Public Health, 207. pp. 73-81. ISSN 0033-3506

Text (Effects of public policies in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases_OA)
Effects_of_public_policies_in_the_prevention_of_cardiovascular_diseases_OA.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs.
Download (809kB)

Abstract

Objectives Given the growing interest worldwide in applying public policies to improve human health, we undertook a systematic review of studies investigating whether public policies targeting unhealthy products could reduce cardiovascular diseases. Study design This study was a systematic review of the literature. Methods We searched research studies published in 2000–2020 from major databases, including MEDLINE and Embase. We followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and narratively synthesized the studies based on vote counting and direction of the intervention effect. Results Ninety-eight studies, mostly from high-income countries, met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were on public policies targeting sugar-sweetened beverages and tobacco, followed by alcohol, sugar, salt, and junk foods. Overall, many reported that several fiscal, regulatory, and educational policies generated beneficial effects of reducing the diseases. Those studies that reported no or limited effects highlighted several sociodemographic and health risk characteristics and design and implementation aspects of the policy interventions as factors limiting the policy effects; most of these are modifiable with appropriate policy interventions. For instance, low magnitude of tax, substitution with other unhealthy products, firms’ competitive response strategies, pre-existence of smoking bans, incremental enactment of smoking regulations, degree of enforcement, and various sociocultural factors minimized the effects of the policies. Conclusion The literature supports a growing consensus on the beneficial effects of public policy for improving human health. The design and implementation of public policies must address various impeding factors and incorporate appropriate remedial measures. Further research is needed from low- and middle-income countries and on whether and how multiple policy instruments work in tandem.