Examining the judgments of pedophiles in relation to a non-sexual offense

Maroño, A. and Bartels, R.M. (2020) Examining the judgments of pedophiles in relation to a non-sexual offense. Psychology, Crime and Law, 26 (9). pp. 887-901. ISSN 1068-316X

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Even though pedophilia is not synonymous with child sexual abuse, it remains a highly stigmatized phenomenon. As such, non-offending pedophilic individuals are judged as being dangerous, abnormal, amoral, and in need of punishment. It is unknown, however, whether a pedophilic individual would be judged more harshly than a heterosexual individual and a homosexual individual in relation to a nonsexual, nonviolent offense. This was the aim of the present study. A final sample of 309 participants were recruited online and allocated to one of three sexual orientation conditions. Participants read the same hypothetical crime report (breaking and entering) followed by a suspect profile that was identical across conditions except for sexual orientation. They then provided sentencing and moral character judgements of the suspect. Participants also completed a punitive attitudes scale pertaining to pedophilia. Results showed that the pedophilic individual received harsher judgments relative to the heterosexual individual, but only at higher levels of pre-existing punitive attitudes. These findings suggest that anti-pedophilia stigma can bias judgments about offenses that are not sexual. We argue that this is due to a 'reverse halo effect'. However, we consider an alternative explanation based on the idea of interpreting information in a schema-consistent manner. Limitations and suggestions for future research are discussed.

Item Type:
Journal Article
Journal or Publication Title:
Psychology, Crime and Law
Uncontrolled Keywords:
/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/3300/3308
Subjects:
ID Code:
150666
Deposited By:
Deposited On:
12 Jan 2021 15:10
Refereed?:
Yes
Published?:
Published
Last Modified:
26 Jan 2021 12:11