Intercomparison of nitrous acid (HONO) measurement techniques in a megacity (Beijing)

Crilley, L.R. and Kramer, L.J. and Ouyang, B. and Duan, J. and Zhang, W. and Tong, S. and Ge, M. and Tang, K. and Qin, M. and Xie, P. and Shaw, M.D. and Lewis, A.C. and Mehra, A. and Bannan, T.J. and Worrall, S.D. and Priestley, M. and Bacak, A. and Coe, H. and Allan, J. and Percival, C.J. and Popoola, O.A.M. and Jones, R.L. and Bloss, W.J. (2019) Intercomparison of nitrous acid (HONO) measurement techniques in a megacity (Beijing). Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 12 (12). pp. 6449-6463. ISSN 1867-1381

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Nitrous acid (HONO) is a key determinant of the daytime radical budget in the daytime boundary layer, with quantitative measurement required to understand OH radical abundance. Accurate and precise measurements of HONO are therefore needed; however HONO is a challenging compound to measure in the field, in particular in a chemically complex and highly polluted environment. Here we report an intercomparison exercise between HONO measurements performed by two wet chemical techniques (the commercially available a long-path absorption photometer (LOPAP) and a custom-built instrument) and two broadband cavity-enhanced absorption spectrophotometer (BBCEAS) instruments at an urban location in Beijing. In addition, we report a comparison of HONO measurements performed by a time-of-flight chemical ionization mass spectrometer (ToF-CIMS) and a selected ion flow tube mass spectrometer (SIFT-MS) to the more established techniques (wet chemical and BBCEAS). The key finding from the current work was that all instruments agree on the temporal trends and variability in HONO (r(2) > 0.97), yet they displayed some divergence in absolute concentrations, with the wet chemical methods consistently higher overall than the BBCEAS systems by between 12% and 39 %. We found no evidence for any systematic bias in any of the instruments, with the exception of measurements near instrument detection limits. The causes of the divergence in absolute HONO concentrations were unclear, and may in part have been due to spatial variability, i.e. differences in instrument location and/or inlet position, but this observation may have been more associative than casual.

Item Type:
Journal Article
Journal or Publication Title:
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Uncontrolled Keywords:
/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/1900/1902
Subjects:
ID Code:
139993
Deposited By:
Deposited On:
13 Jan 2020 14:25
Refereed?:
Yes
Published?:
Published
Last Modified:
20 Oct 2020 08:04