The impact of fault models on software robustness evaluations

Winter, S. and Sârbu, C. and Suri, Neeraj and Murphy, B. (2011) The impact of fault models on software robustness evaluations. In: Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Software Engineering. ACM, pp. 51-60. ISBN 9781450304450

Full text not available from this repository.


Following the design and in-lab testing of software, the evaluation of its resilience to actual operational perturbations in the field is a key validation need. Software-implemented fault injection (SWIFI) is a widely used approach for evaluating the robustness of software components. Recent research [24, 18] indicates that the selection of the applied fault model has considerable influence on the results of SWIFI-based evaluations, thereby raising the question how to select appropriate fault models (i.e. that provide justified robustness evidence). This paper proposes several metrics for comparatively evaluating fault models's abilities to reveal robustness vulnerabilities. It demonstrates their application in the context of OS device drivers by investigating the influence (and relative utility) of four commonly used fault models, i.e. bit flips (in function parameters and in binaries), data type dependent parameter corruptions, and parameter fuzzing. We assess the efficiency of these models at detecting robustness vulnerabilities during the SWIFI evaluation of a real embedded operating system kernel and discuss application guidelines for our metrics alongside. © 2011 ACM.

Item Type:
Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings
ID Code:
Deposited By:
Deposited On:
14 Oct 2019 13:46
Last Modified:
15 Sep 2023 02:03