Barańska, I. and Kijowska, V. and Engels, Y. and Finne-Soveri, H. and Froggatt, K. and Gambassi, G. and Hammar, T. and Oosterveld-Vlug, M. and Payne, S. and Van Den Noortgate, N. and Smets, T. and Deliens, L. and Van den Block, L. and Szczerbińska, K. and Adang, E. and Andreasen, P. and Collingridge Moore, D. and van Hout, H. and Ten Koppel, M. and Mammarella, F. and Mercuri, M. and Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B.D. and Pivodic, L. and Rossi, P. and Sowerby, E. and Stodolska, A. and Wichmann, A. and van der Steen, J.T. and Vernooij-Dassen, M. (2020) Factors Associated with Perception of the Quality of Physicians' End-of-life Communication in Long-Term Care Facilities : PACE Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 21 (3). 439.e1-439.e8. ISSN 1525-8610
Full text not available from this repository.Abstract
Objective: To examine factors associated with perceived quality of communication with physicians by relatives of dying residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Design: A cross-sectional retrospective study in a representative sample of LTCFs conducted in 2015. In each LTCF, deaths of residents during the 3 months before the researcher's visit were reported. Structured questionnaires were sent to the identified relatives of deceased residents. Settings and participants: A total of 736 relatives of deceased residents in 210 LTCFs (in Belgium, Finland, Italy, the Netherlands, and Poland). Methods: The Family Perception of Physician-Family Communication scale (FPPFC) was used to assess the quality of end-of-life (EOL) communication with physicians as perceived by relatives. We applied multilevel linear regression models to find factors associated with the FPPFC score. Results: The quality of EOL communication with physicians was perceived by relatives as higher when the relative spent more than 14 hours with the resident in the last week of the resident's life (b = 0.205; P = .044), and when the treating physician visited the resident at least 3 times in the last week of the resident's life (b = 0.286; P = .002) or provided the resident with palliative care (b = 0.223; P = .003). Relatives with higher emotional burden perceived the quality of EOL communication with physicians as lower (b = −0.060; P < .001). These results had been adjusted to countries and LTCF types with physicians employed on-site or off-site of the facility. Conclusion: The quality of EOL communication with physicians, as perceived by relatives of dying LTCF residents, is associated with the number of physician visits and amount of time spent by the relative with the resident in the last week of the resident's life, and relatives' emotional burden. Implications: LTCF managers should organize care for dying residents in a way that enables frequent interactions between physicians and relatives, and emotional support to relatives to improve their satisfaction with EOL communication.