Interplay between body stabilisation and quadriceps muscle activation capacity

Bampouras, Theodoros M. and Reeves, Neil D. and Baltzopoulos, Vasilios and Maganaris, Constantinos N. (2017) Interplay between body stabilisation and quadriceps muscle activation capacity. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 34. pp. 44-49. ISSN 1050-6411

PDF (Bampouras et al_Interplay between body stabilisation and quadriceps muscle activation capacity)
Bampouras_et_al_Interplay_between_body_stabilisation_and_quadriceps_muscle_activation_capacity.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (364kB)


The study aimed to distinguish the effect of stabilisation and muscle activation on quadriceps maximal isometric voluntary contraction (MVC) torque generation. Nine subjects performed (a) an MVC with restrained leg and pelvis (Typical MVC), (b) a Typical MVC with handgrip (Handgrip MVC), (c) an MVC focusing on contracting the knee extensors only (Isolated knee extension MVC), and (d) an MVC with unrestrained leg and pelvis (Unrestrained MVC). Torque and activation capacity between conditions were compared with repeated measures ANOVA and dependent t-tests. EMG (from eleven remote muscles) was compared using Friedman’s and Wilcoxon. Typical MVC (277.2 ± 49.6 Nm) and Handgrip MVC (261.0 ± 55.4 Nm) were higher than Isolated knee extension MVC (210.2 ± 48.3 Nm, p < 0.05) and Unrestrained MVC (195.2 ± 49.7 Nm, p < 0.05) torque. Typical MVC (83.1 ± 15.9%) activation was higher than Isolated knee extension MVC (68.9 ± 24.3%, p < 0.05), and both Typical MVC and Handgrip MVC (81.8 ± 17.4%) were higher than Unrestrained MVC (64.9 ± 16.2%, p < 0.05). Only flexor carpi radialis, biceps brachii, triceps brachii and external oblique muscles showed EMG differences, with Isolated knee extension MVC consistently lower than Typical MVC or Handgrip MVC. Stabilisation of the involved segments is the prime concern allowing fuller activation of the muscle, reinforcing the need for close attention to stabilisation during dynamometry-based knee joint functional assessment.

Item Type:
Journal Article
Journal or Publication Title:
Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
Additional Information:
This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 34, 2017 DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2017.03.002
Uncontrolled Keywords:
ID Code:
Deposited By:
Deposited On:
26 Sep 2018 12:12
Last Modified:
22 Nov 2022 06:19