Values Associated with Service User and Public Involvement (UPI) in Health and Social Care Research: a Narrative Review

Gradinger, Felix and Britten, Nicky and Wyatt, Katrina and Froggatt, Katherine and Gibson, Andy and Jacoby, Ann and Lobban, Fiona and Mayes, Deborah and Snape, Dee and Rawcliffe, Tim and Popay, Jennie (2015) Values Associated with Service User and Public Involvement (UPI) in Health and Social Care Research: a Narrative Review. Health Expectations, 18 (5). pp. 661-675. ISSN 1369-6513

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Background Much has been written about public involvement (PI) in health and social care research, but underpinning values are rarely made explicit despite the potential for these to have significant influence on the practice and assessment of PI. Objective The narrative review reported here is part of a larger MRC‐funded study which is producing a framework and related guidance on assessing the impact of PI in health and social care research. The review aimed to identify and characterize the range of values associated with PI that are central elements of the framework. Methods We undertook a review and narrative synthesis of diverse literatures of PI in health and social care research, including twenty existing reviews and twenty‐four chapters in sixteen textbooks. Results Three overarching value systems were identified, each containing five value clusters. (i) A system concerned with ethical and/or political issues including value clusters associated with empowerment; change/action; accountability/transparency; rights; and ethics (normative values). (ii). A system concerned with the consequences of public involvement in research including value clusters associated with effectiveness; quality/relevance; validity/reliability; representativeness/objectivity/generalizability; and evidence (substantive values). (iii) A system concerned with the conduct of public involvement in including value clusters associated with Partnership/equality; respect/trust; openness and honesty; independence; and clarity (process values). Conclusion Our review identified three systems associated with PI in health and social care research focused on normative, substantive and process values. The findings suggest that research teams should consider and make explicit the values they attach to PI in research and discuss ways in which potential tensions may be managed in order to maximize the benefits of PI for researchers, lay experts and the research.

Item Type:
Journal Article
Journal or Publication Title:
Health Expectations
Uncontrolled Keywords:
/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2700/2739
Subjects:
ID Code:
124263
Deposited By:
Deposited On:
26 Mar 2018 08:06
Refereed?:
Yes
Published?:
Published
Last Modified:
16 Sep 2020 01:27