Gender and Hedging: From Sex Differences to Situated Practice.

Dixon, John A. and Foster, Don H. (1997) Gender and Hedging: From Sex Differences to Situated Practice. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26 (1). pp. 89-107. ISSN 0090-6905

Full text not available from this repository.


In a reanalysis of women's language, Holmes (1995) has argued that women's use of hedges expresses interpersonal warmth and not, as many researchers have maintained, linguistic tentativeness. It is typically men, she suggests, who employ hedges to convey imprecision and incertitude. In this study, we investigated the use of the hedges sort of and you know in a sample of South African students. Holmes's method of analysis was applied to hedging behavior in 52 dyadic conversations. The study consisted of a 2 (Speaker Gender: Male/Female) X 2 (Audience Gender: Male/Female) X 2 (Condition: Competitive/Noncompetitive) between-subjects experimental design. The results showed that contextual influences eclipsed the effects of gender; in fact, no main effects were found for speaker gender. Fewer hedges were deployed in the competitive condition than in the noncompetitive condition. Moreover, perhaps reflecting differences in social status, both sexes used sort of to express tentativeness more frequently when talking to male addressees. When speaking to female addressees, on the other hand, men deployed facilitative you know hedges more readily than women.

Item Type:
Journal Article
Journal or Publication Title:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
Uncontrolled Keywords:
ID Code:
Deposited By:
Deposited On:
30 Jul 2008 10:06
Last Modified:
21 Nov 2022 18:02