Baker, Paul (2012) Acceptable bias?:Using corpus linguistics methods with critical discourse analysis. Critical Discourse Studies, 9 (3). pp. 247-256. ISSN 1740-5904Full text not available from this repository.
This paper considers the proposal that corpus linguistics approaches can improve the objectivity of critical discourse analysis research, resulting in a more robust and valid set of findings. Taking a recent project which examined the representation of Islam and Muslims in the British press, corpus-driven procedures identified that Muslims tended to be linked to the concept of extreme belief much more than moderate or strong belief. There were differences across newspapers, with 1 in 8 Muslims describing it as extreme in The People while this figure was 1 in 35 for The Guardian. Such patterns of quantification, however, still require researchers to carry out their own critical interpretations with regard to what counts as acceptable frequencies.
|Journal or Publication Title:||Critical Discourse Studies|
|Uncontrolled Keywords:||corpus linguistics ; Islam ; bias ; extremism ; CDA|
|Subjects:||P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics|
|Departments:||Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences > Linguistics & English Language|
|Deposited On:||03 Oct 2012 10:27|
|Last Modified:||23 Apr 2017 04:01|
Actions (login required)