Lancaster EPrints

Associating versus proposing or associating what we propose: Comment on Gawronski and Bodenhausen (2006)

Albarracin, Dolores and Hart, William and McCulloch, Kathleen C. (2006) Associating versus proposing or associating what we propose: Comment on Gawronski and Bodenhausen (2006). Psychological Bulletin, 132 (5). pp. 732-735. ISSN 0033-2909

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

This commentary highlights the strengths of the associative-propositional evaluation model. It then describes problems in proposing a qualitative separation between propositional and associative processes. Propositional processes are instead described as associative. Propositions are ordered associations, whereas many other associations do not depend on the order of the involved elements. Implications of this alternative definition for the phenomenology of thought and for social psychology are discussed.

Item Type: Article
Journal or Publication Title: Psychological Bulletin
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Departments: Faculty of Science and Technology > Psychology
ID Code: 57706
Deposited By: ep_importer_pure
Deposited On: 16 Oct 2012 09:41
Refereed?: Yes
Published?: Published
Last Modified: 10 Apr 2014 00:01
Identification Number:
URI: http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/57706

Actions (login required)

View Item