Carpendale, Jeremy I. M. and Lewis, Charlie (2008) Mirroring cannot account for understanding action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31 (1). pp. 23-24. ISSN 0140-525X
![[img]](http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png)
| PDF - Published Version Download (656Kb) | Preview |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X07003147
Abstract
Susan Hurley's shared circuits model (SCM) rightly begins in action and progresses through a series of layers; but it fails to reach action understanding because it relies on mirroring as a driving force, draws on heavily criticized theories, and neglects the need for shared experience in our grasp of social understanding.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Journal or Publication Title: | Behavioral and Brain Sciences |
| Additional Information: | http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=BBS The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Behavioral and Brain Science, 31 (1), pp 23-24 2008, © 2008 Cambridge University Press. |
| Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology |
| Departments: | Faculty of Science and Technology > Psychology |
| ID Code: | 55500 |
| Deposited By: | ep_importer_pure |
| Deposited On: | 29 Jun 2012 11:39 |
| Refereed?: | Yes |
| Published?: | Published |
| Last Modified: | 26 Jul 2012 20:39 |
| Identification Number: | |
| URI: | http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/55500 |
Actions (login required)
| View Item |
