Lancaster EPrints

The Assessment of Research Quality: Peer Review or Metrics?

Taylor, J (2009) The Assessment of Research Quality: Peer Review or Metrics? Working Paper. The Department of Economics, Lancaster University.

[img]
Preview
PDF (Document.pdf)
Download (189Kb) | Preview

    Abstract

    This paper investigates the extent to which the outcomes of the 2008 Research Assessment Exercise, determined by peer review, can be explained by a set of quantitative indicators, some of which were made available to the review panels. Three cognate units of assessment are examined in detail: business & management, economics & econometrics, and accounting & finance. The paper focuses on the extent to which the quality of research output, as determined by the RAE panel, can be explained by the journal quality indicator published by the Association of Business Schools. The main finding is that although a high proportion of the variation between universities in their RAE outcomes can be explained by quantitative indicators, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim by the ABS that its Journal Quality Guide is a sufficiently accurate predictor of research quality to justify a predominant role in the research assessment process. A further finding is that there appears to be an element of bias in the decisions reached by the business & management panel and by the economics & econometrics panel.

    Item Type: Monograph (Working Paper)
    Subjects: UNSPECIFIED
    Departments: Lancaster University Management School > Economics
    ID Code: 48972
    Deposited By: ep_importer_pure
    Deposited On: 11 Jul 2011 22:25
    Refereed?: No
    Published?: Published
    Last Modified: 10 Apr 2014 02:42
    Identification Number:
    URI: http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/48972

    Actions (login required)

    View Item