Trehan, Kiran and Rigg, Clare (2011) Theorising critical HRD:a paradox of intricacy and discrepancy. Journal of European Industrial Training, 35 (3). pp. 276-290. ISSN 0309-0590Full text not available from this repository.
Purpose – This paper aims to advance theoretical understanding of the concept of “critical human resource development”. Design/methodology/approach – This is a conceptual paper. Findings – Foregrounding questions of power, emotions and political dynamics within the analysis of organisational learning and development activity, critical approaches in HRD pay particular attention to the importance of context, interests and patterns of inter-relationships amongst organisation stakeholders. It is notable that much of the work in this area operates on a theoretical plane, and is often light on practical guidance or recognition of the distinctive contexts of HRD practice, compared to other areas of critical learning. Research limitations/implications – Empirical investigations that have systematically applied critical approaches to HRD are in short supply, and their potential to enrich HRD practice has rarely been explored. This paper contributes to addressing these gaps. Originality/value – Firstly, it elucidates the concept of critical HRD through illuminating the diversity of theoretical perspectives; secondly, it demonstrate some of the intricacies and discrepancies within current theorising on critical HRD; thirdly, it raises questions for the practical significance of tools and insights informed by critical HRD.
|Journal or Publication Title:||Journal of European Industrial Training|
|Uncontrolled Keywords:||Human resource development ; Learning ; Management power|
|Departments:||Lancaster University Management School > Management Learning & Leadership|
|Deposited On:||11 Jul 2011 19:21|
|Last Modified:||13 Jan 2016 13:26|
Actions (login required)