Nature, continental philosophy, and environmental ethics.

Stone, Alison (2005) Nature, continental philosophy, and environmental ethics. Environmental Values, 14 (3). pp. 285-294. ISSN 0963-2719

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Until recently, there has been relatively little self-conscious reflection - from either environmental or continental philosophers - on the specific contributions which continental philosophy, insofar as it is a distinctive tradition, might make to environmental thought. This situation has begun to change with several recent publications, such as Charles S. Brown and Ted Toadvine's (2003) edited collection Ecophenomenology: Back to the Earth Itself, and Bruce V. Foltz and Robert Frodeman's (2004) collection Rethinking Nature: Essays in Environmental Philosophy. This special issue aims to continue the discussion of how the continental tradition might advance or transform environmental thinking, both by reconsidering authors such as Kant, Schelling, Nietzsche and Heidegger, and by considering how themes and concepts from continental philosophy and social theory - including Merleau-Ponty's concept of flesh, Foucault's notion of discipline, and Bourdieu's social critique of taste - bear on environmental practice and theory.

Item Type:
Journal Article
Journal or Publication Title:
Environmental Values
Uncontrolled Keywords:
/dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/libraryofcongress/b1
Subjects:
?? ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICSHOLDERLINNOVALISSCHELLINGCONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHYPHILOSOPHYENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE (MISCELLANEOUS)B PHILOSOPHY (GENERAL) ??
ID Code:
35608
Deposited By:
Deposited On:
25 Jan 2011 13:43
Refereed?:
Yes
Published?:
Published
Last Modified:
18 Sep 2023 00:19