Lancaster EPrints

You have full text access to this contentInformed Consent: Autonomy and Self-Ownership.

Archard, David (2008) You have full text access to this contentInformed Consent: Autonomy and Self-Ownership. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 25 (1). pp. 19-34.

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Using the example of an unconsented mouth swab I criticise the view that an action of this kind taken in itself is wrongful in respect of its being a violation of autonomy. This is so much inasmuch as autonomy merits respect only with regard to ‘critical life choices’. I consider the view that such an action is nevertheless harmful or risks serious harm. I also respond to two possible suggestions: that the action is of a kind that violates autonomy; and, that the class of such actions violates autonomy. I suggest that the action is wrongful in as much as it is a bodily trespass. I consider, and criticise, two ways of understanding how morally I stand to my own body: as owner and as sovereign. In respect of the latter I consider Arthur Ripstein's recent defence of a sovereignty principle. Finally I criticise an attempt by Joel Feinberg to explain bodily trespass in terms of personal autonomy.

Item Type: Article
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of Applied Philosophy
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)
Departments: Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences > Politics & International Relations (Merged into PPR 2010-08-01)
ID Code: 34175
Deposited By: Mrs Yaling Zhang
Deposited On: 08 Sep 2010 10:29
Refereed?: Yes
Published?: Published
Last Modified: 26 Jul 2012 17:34
Identification Number:
URI: http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/34175

Actions (login required)

View Item