Lancaster EPrints

Essentialism and Anti-Essentialism in Feminist Philosophy.

Stone, Alison (2004) Essentialism and Anti-Essentialism in Feminist Philosophy. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 1 (2). pp. 135-153.

[img]
Preview
PDF (Microsoft_Word_-_E9130088.pdf)
Download (201Kb) | Preview

    Abstract

    This paper revisits the ethical and political questions raised by feminist debates over essentialism. Reviewing these seemingly disparate debates, I identify in them a coherent history of engagement with 'essentialism' understood, in a relatively unified sense, as the belief that there are properties essential to women and which all women share. Feminists' widespread rejection of essentialism posed a well-known problem: it undermined feminist politics by denying women any shared characteristics which might motivate them into collective action. Re-evaluating two responses to this problem - 'strategic' essentialism and Iris Marion Young's idea that women are not a unified group but an internally diverse 'series' - I argue that are both are unsatisfactory, tacitly retaining essentialism as a descriptive claim about the social reality of women's lives. However, building on Young's idea that women should be reconceived as a non-unified sort of social group, I argue for understanding women to have a genealogy. Based on a reading of Nietzsche's concept of genealogy, I suggest that women always acquire femininity by appropriating and reworking existing cultural interpretations of femininity, with the result that all women become situated within a history of overlapping chains of interpretation. Because all women are located within this complex history, they are identifiable as belonging to a determinate social group, even though they do not share any common understanding or experience of femininity. I conclude that the idea that women have a genealogy can allow feminists to reconcile anti-essentialism with commitment to a coalitional politics.

    Item Type: Article
    Journal or Publication Title: Journal of Moral Philosophy
    Additional Information: “The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Journal of Moral Philosophy, 1 (2), 2004, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2004 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Journal of Moral Philosophy page: http://mpj.sagepub.com/ on SAGE Journals Online: http://online.sagepub.com/
    Subjects: H Social Sciences > HQ The family. Marriage. Woman
    Departments: Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences > Politics & International Relations (Merged into PPR 2010-08-01)
    ID Code: 34
    Deposited By: Dr Alison Stone
    Deposited On: 13 Jun 2005
    Refereed?: Yes
    Published?: Published
    Last Modified: 26 Jul 2012 17:31
    Identification Number:
    URI: http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/34

    Actions (login required)

    View Item