May, Chris (2007) The hypocracy of forgetfulness: the contemporary significance of early innovations in intellectual property. Review of International Political Economy, 14 (1). pp. 1-25. ISSN 0969-2290Full text not available from this repository.
Although often now presented as a potentially universal set of legal principles, the particular history of the initial development of intellectual property rights (IPRs), first in Venice, then subsequently in Britain and across Europe is directly related to Europe's specific history. In this paper, I argue that we cannot separate the development of intellectual property as a legal form from the specific early history of capitalism in Europe. The technological, institutional and political philosophical developments that underlay the development of nascent IPRs were a specific historical conjunction and suggests that rather than a universal set of rights, IPRs must be set in their historical, political economic context. In conclusion I draw some links between questions of differential treatment under contemporary multilateral governance through the Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights agreement and this early history of intellectual property to criticise the claims for a universal set of institutionalised rights without regard to levels of economic development.
|Journal or Publication Title:||Review of International Political Economy|
|Additional Information:||RAE_import_type : Journal article RAE_uoa_type : Politics and International Studies reprinted in: May, C (ed.) The Political Economy of Intellectual Property Rights (3 vols) (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2010)|
|Uncontrolled Keywords:||Intellectual property rights ; commodification ; history of intellectual property ; markets|
|Subjects:||J Political Science > JA Political science (General)|
|Departments:||Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences > Politics & International Relations (Merged into PPR 2010-08-01)|
|Deposited On:||26 Mar 2008 09:30|
|Last Modified:||24 Mar 2017 02:56|
Actions (login required)