Jackson, Nicola (2006) Overreaching In Registered Land Law. Modern Law Review, 69 (2). pp. 214-241. ISSN 1468-2230Full text not available from this repository.
Beneficial interests under a trust were not intended to be overriding interests under section 70(1)(g) of the Land Registration Act 1925. The position was altered by Williams & Glyn's Bank Ltd v Boland, which determined that an interest under a trust for sale would bind a purchaser if the beneficiary were in actual occupation. The decision raised the question whether such interests could be overreached once the beneficiary was in occupation of the trust property. City of London Building Society v Flegg held that the relevant beneficial interest had been overreached. Both decisions assume that overreaching in registered conveyancing takes effect as it does in unregistered land. Yet there is considerable evidence that the Land Registration Act contains its own overreaching machinery. The House of Lords applied the wrong overreaching provisions in Boland and Flegg and there is no legal basis on which to recognise that trust interests can override a subsequent disposition under section 70(1)(g).
|Journal or Publication Title:||Modern Law Review|
|Additional Information:||RAE_import_type : Journal article RAE_uoa_type : Law|
|Subjects:||K Law > K Law (General)|
|Departments:||Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences > Law School|
|Deposited On:||26 Mar 2008 11:16|
|Last Modified:||13 Jan 2016 12:08|
Actions (login required)